🔗 Share this article

Europe experienced widespread relief on Monday, as the diplomatic emergency sparked by the introduction of a new 28-article proposal for resolving the conflict appeared – temporarily – to have been defused. A Washington representative spoke of "notable headway" after bilateral negotiations in Geneva. On Monday night, Russian leadership made its retaliation: another massive barrage of aerial bombardment on Kyiv.

The Cycle of Negotiation and Warfare

The succession of contrasting events captured the harsh reality of the current period. By day, diplomatic battles are conducted: positive announcements are issued from various governments. Immense energy is devoted on containing specific proposals. By night, Russian leadership brutally reminds the world that, for them, war remains the key method for achieving "resolution".

After-Dark Attacks

As military strikes progressed into the early hours of Tuesday, the current condition of Ukraine's defenselessness was exposed. Ukraine is capable of detecting projectile deployments from Russian territory, a capacity afforded by current data. From observation points, Ukrainian air force fighter jets that had been dispatched to engage hostile aerial threats streaked across the sky – modern combat jets provided to Ukraine by NATO members.

Shortly after, Kyiv's air-defence systems engaged: multiple launches targeted at a hostile projectile. This was a sophisticated defense system at work, presumably delivered by Western nations. Every deployment jolts you unexpectedly, shaking the windows. The brief panic quickly becomes sober acceptance: possibly the hostile projectile won't strike its target this time, preventing destruction from devastation and additional electricity failures.

Continuous Dangers

Following this, a heavy machine gun engaged a unmanned aircraft close by, part of a defensive team – almost certainly imported technology. Sadly, the bullets missed the opposing UAV – it continued its flight toward its destination.

Periodically, this carried on until dawn. Kyiv greeted the early updates: seven people killed, damage and heating outages in many homes as a result of the nocturnal offensive. As customarily, everyone still went about their day – living the war. But those entire period encapsulated Ukraine's critical military reliance on international aid – a reliance that regional partners are demonstrably unable to substitute in the short term.

Ineffective Peace Efforts

The 28-point plan from American leadership generated strong feelings, discussion and deep concern – and temporarily diverted attention from Ukraine's largest corruption scandal in years. Yet, we have seen this script before, after prior negotiation attempts and multilateral gatherings.

Every new proposal from Washington unfolds according to the consistent cycle: a political offensive against Ukraine, which Kyiv, with allied governments, effectively counters. They manage the tension but never actually achieve victory. This pattern will, undoubtedly, persist.

Political Considerations

It is tempting to accuse particular leaders of consistently pushing Russian terms. But that does not seem to be the complete picture. US administration functions according to a premise familiar among experienced diplomats: you cannot win at the negotiating table what you have lost on the battlefield. The White House assumes that it is unrealistic to pressure the Kremlin to abandon the land that it currently occupies in Ukraine's southern or eastern regions.

The challenge is that while accepting these circumstances, US leadership does minimal to discourage Russia, through statements or actions, from thinking that the situation will not evolve additionally in its favour in the months ahead.

Opposing Positions

Therefore, Russian leadership is confident that the clock favors them – that Ukraine and its partners are nearing depletion. Their reason to agree to terms that does not give them the largest achievable advantage is almost completely absent. There may be numerous efforts to end hostilities, but they will carry on as long as Russia's government remains highly assured in the result.

On the contrary, Ukraine's government believes that Ukraine can still persist, gradually sacrificing civilians and areas but avoiding a complete military breakdown until circumstances change in its favour.

Existing Situation

Factually, there are no real preconditions for a ceasefire. Now, subjective factors are entering the equation: political desires to mediate resolution and secure international recognition, and Ukrainian leadership's twin challenges – on one hand, not to estrange crucial supporters, and on the other, to unite the population around the flag against any proposal Kyiv finds unsuitable, so that their focus does not switch to domestic problems. And although their objective will now be considerably more difficult after recent developments, it remains highly unlikely that this will alter their fundamental strategy.

These opposing factors are guiding negotiations.

Summary and Prospects

It took a just a single week to eliminate the 28 points of the most recent proposal. Aggressive and erratic handling of the matter by Washington, pushback by Ukraine and the other European countries, along with calming attempts of diplomats, and finally, latest revelations, all achieved their purpose.

While new initiatives based on old ideas are forthcoming, Kyiv, London and other European capitals should reach an essential realization: Ukraine and Europe will only be able to resist negotiation assaults from Washington that are rooted in Kremlin requirements and reflect certain reluctance to change the course of events, if they remain united and enhance their military capacity at a considerably quicker tempo. If they do, neither external pressure nor military threats will be able to overcome them. In the meantime, Ukraine's capacity to defend against evening bombardments will, for the coming months, largely rely on ongoing international assistance.